2.1
Are there identified deficiencies of 'key skills' in the target
groups?
Chapter 1 outlined the diagnostic phase of the KeyNet Project
during which it became evident that there is, at both a local
and national level, clear deficiencies in 'key skills' among the
target groups. A number of these deficiencies were highlighted.
A
number of general points may be made about these findings:
There are two types of 'key skills deficiencies': (a) deficiencies
or weaknesses in competence in each of the individual key skills;
and (b) deficiencies in the provision of teaching or training
provision. Both were evident in the North Wales TEP. (It should
be noted, however, that the corollary also holds true - there
were examples of high levels of achievement in the key skills
and of 'good practice' in their delivery.)
In the first category, there is a limited competence in all of
the six listed key skills, but it is most marked in application
of number and IT. But this is something of an over-simplification,
and it is important to raise a number of 'variations' to this
general pattern. The main variations are,
(i)
a general weakness in communication skills, a weakness that becomes
more marked in the over-40 age group;
(ii) a general weakness in application of number in both of the
target groups;
(iii)
relatively poor performance with the over-40 year olds in IT skills.
This was not so apparent with the 16-23 age group;
(iv)
far more training is needed in 'Working with Others' and 'Improving
Own Learning and Performance'
It
is obvious that an individual's strengths and weaknesses in the
key skills is, to a large extent, heavily influenced by the type
and quality of education received, when and where it was received.
In the context of the 'delivery of key skills', deficiencies were
most marked among those individuals, in both target groups, who
had received an 'academic' education and no 'vocational' training,
and least marked among those who had received some kind of vocational
or occupational training, i.e. GNVQ or NVQ.
The
problem has been addressed in the government publication 'An
Education and Training Action Plan for Wales' (March, 1999),
already referred to, in which it is pointed out that part of the
deficiency problem arises from the fact that 'the skills that
employers most value are complex. They are the ones which are
transferable across most jobs and can be updated by training throughout
working life….They are about lifting expectations and progressively
improving attainment…. They are the basic, key and generic skills.'
2.2 Are there examples of good practice?
The North Wales TEP is particularly fortunate in the number of
examples of good practice evident in schools, colleges and among
training providers. To a large extent this is a result of the
long history of research and development of a number of the local
authorities within the TEP. They have gained a reputation for
developing innovative training programmes. At a general level,
there are examples of good practice in which programmes aim to:
raise the key skills awareness of 'small' employers.
assist
work place assessors in coming to terms with the demands of assessment,
especially independent, context-free assessments.
spread
good practice among trainers.
At
a more specific level, the following centres have developed examples
of good practice in the identification and delivery of key skills:
NEWI
at Deeside and Wrexham;
Llandrillo
College;
Coleg
Gwynedd; and
Coleg
Pengraig.
Electonically focused programmes have been developed at the Llangefni
Resources Centre on Anglesey.
In
addition, Coleg Gwynedd, Coleg Pencraig and the Langefni Resources
Centre are important players in developments in the context of
the Welsh language.
The context of 'Good Practice'
Evidence collected for this Report, together with work carried
out for both 'Future Skills Wales' (North Wales), and the
'Key Skills Best Practice Project' suggest that Key Skills
have a major role to play in
preparing the young and middle-aged unemployed for employment;
and ·
for
their re-entry into the world of work.
However,
if these needs are to be met it is obvious that there is a need
for a planned, coherent programme set within the context of 'the
region', in this case the North Wales TEP. This requires links
at the macro level (the North Wales TEP, the TECs), at an intermediate
level (the regional FE colleges) and locally (in schools and colleges,
and in association with a range of employers). The aim should
be to achieve a combination of:
raising employer awareness of the importance of key skills in
developing job-specific skills, enhancing transferable skills
and raising trainee confidence levels.
providing a support system for the unemployed, e.g. opportunities
to practise Key Skills as they acquire them, even if they have
not yet found employment.
ensuring that the trainers/skill providers are aware of the employment
situation and job opportunities.
developing appropriate, recognised qualifications which recognise
achievement.
At
a more practical level, the 'Key Skills Best Practice Project'
suggests that Key Skills empower people in their attempts to enter/re-enter
the world of work. They further indicate that Key Skills are best
delivered if the following are achieved:
both trainee and trainer are clear about the nature and purpose
of Key Skills.
Key Skills are most effectively delivered, particularly among
the older unemployed, if they are employer-led, i.e. where
an employer (a) takes on an unemployed person or an apprentice,
(b) utilises a 'provider' to deliver the training as necessary,
and (c) confirms this through a 'contract' between the two, often
facilitated by a local FE college.
There are links with the local FE college, or other provider,
to supply assessor training.
Funding is made available to maximise the individual
development of the unemployed person by allowing her/him to
undertake appropriate whole training programmes.
The qualifications are understood and accepted by trainee
and employer.
There is appropriate funding for the training-qualification
programme.
The Examples
Evidence already referred to highlights a number of areas of potential
difficulty in the delivery and assessment of key skills; on the
other hand, a number of examples of 'good practice' are already
evident within Wales generally, and in the North Wales TEP in
particular. However, analysis of a range of 'good practice' points
to the conclusion that it is not feasible to define one all-embracing
example of 'best practice' that would address all contexts. Nevertheless,
the 'Key Skills Best Practice Project' already referred
to, suggests that it is possible to isolate a number of 'common
ingredients' which appear to figure in most successful projects.
Taken together they could become a 'template' which indicates
a number of principles by which successful strategies could be
developed. Most 'successful' examples of good practice appear
to address the following issues:
The need to have available suitably experienced staff,
in sufficient numbers, dedicated to the design, delivery and assessment
of Key Skills.
It is essential that adequate planning and preparation
are carried out before the commencement of a Key Skills programme,
e.g. evidence mapping and linking documentation should be devised
together with the associated assessment and recording -
in 'user friendly' format. Also, the development of complementary
strategies for assessment in the work place.
A system that facilitates regular communication between
student/trainers and employers.
At the commencement of a course, students/trainers should
be introduced to the concept of Key Skills. Ideally, this is done
through an 'induction programme'. This can lead to students/trainers
accepting responsibility for finding opportunities themselves
for evidence collection and for carrying out their own mapping,
linking and tracking, wherever possible. In practical terms, students/trainees
see are able to see Key Skills as an integral and important part
of their training and future employability.
Assessment is made relevant and important to the students/trainers
themselves i.e. they see that assessment both highlights the
skills they possess and allows them to identify the gaps
in their skills 'portfolio'.
The development of effective and manageable recording systems
that show progress. They can be used by the assessor, are
understood by the employer and can be developed by the student/trainee.
The
two detailed examples that are linked to here illustrate a number
of important facets of Key Skills training programmes aimed at
the young and older unemployed, especially -
the importance of involving a range of providers in the delivery
programme;
the
value attached to 'training the trainers';
the
need for the active involvement of employers; and,
critically,
the high status attached to the close links between training,
assessment and qualifications.
All
too often in practice, training programmes have been identified
with a continuation of education and training strategies which
have already 'failed' the student or trainer. The examples show
different, but successful approaches to the isuue.
Example
1: University of Wales, Bangor (Training Section)
This
example illustrates the value of close working relationships
between trainee, trainer and employer in ensuring the
full integration of Key Skills within the vocational pathway
to the mutual benefit of the trainee, employability and
the work place.
|
Example
2: STC, Treforest
(Note:
this example of 'best practice' is located in south Wales,
outside the North Wales TEP, but has been included because
it complements the Bangor example, and is a good model
for use within the exemplar region)
This
example illustrates the importance of (a) the evaluation
of appropriate prior learning, (b) the use of well-qualified
trainers, and (c) workplace-based training programmes
in the delivery of effective key skills programmes.
|
Other examples of good practice
There
is a significant range of further examples of good practice in
the North Wales TEP of which the following are especially significant:
North East Wales, Deeside College, Connah's Quay:
Recruitment of peripatetic Key Skills specialists for the assessment
of key skills in the workplace.
North East Wales, Yale College, Wrexham:
College Learning Resources Centre used to provide Open Access
for Employers, and outreach to the community for Key Skills development.
North West Wales, Coleg Menai:
The establishment of a learning support unit for the implementation
of Key Skills across all courses in the college.
North West Wales, NWT, Colwyn Bay:
The Appointment of a Key Skills Co-ordinator to support the implementation
of Key Skills throughout all routes. The development of appropriate
documentation across all routes.
Taken
in total, the examples of good/best practice listed and discussed
above, suggest that for a strategy to succeed and for key skills
to be delivered effectively, the following must be present:
Those involved must be clear about the nature and purpose
of key skills.
Programmes should be employer-led or influenced.
There are links between the provider, the local college/training
institution and the employer.
There is adequate funding for the trainee (often unemployed).
The qualifications are understood and accepted by trainee and
employer.
There is appropriate funding for the training-qualification programme.
2.3 Can key skills development
be included in technical skills training?
The
short answer to this question is 'Yes', but there is another response,
too - one of the most effective ways of delivering a key skills
programme, thereby developing key skills competencies, is in and
through technical skills training. The diagnostic work for the
KeyNet Project indicated clearly that, ideally, technical training,
and all types of teaching and training programmes can serve as
vehicles for the deliver of a key skills programme. The process
by which this may be achieved (the 'How?') is illustrated in the
diagram below.
The last stage, 'Assessment', in this process allows the trainer
and employer to discover the validity and success of the complete
training programme for all those involved. Effective assessment
allows a range of questions to be answered by:
those who have received the training (the student/trainee/unemployed);
those
who provided it (the teacher/trainer);
those
who have funded the process (individual/local or central
government/industry); and
those
who will 'receive' the trainees (further and higher education/the
employers).
back | top | next
